Commentary for Bava Kamma 236:14

<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> אין לוקחין מן הרועים צמר וחלב וגדיים ולא משומרי פירות עצים ופירות

whereas R. Ishmael held that the bailment did not [thereby] come to an end.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the restoration is therefore legally valid. ');">²³</span> May we still say that [whether or not] counting exempts is a question at issue between Tannaim; for it was taught: If a man robbed another but made [up for the amount by] inserting it in his settlement of accounts, it was taught on one occasion that he thereby fulfilled his duty, whereas it was taught elsewhere that he did not fulfil his duty.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' B.M. 64a. ');">²⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 236:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.